
To day there is debate between the secular humanists and the spiritual seeker about the value and place of reason and logic. Both parties in this debate are engaged in a dualistic thinking that you are either one or the other. The problem is not in reason or in spirituality it is in the way we think about these things. First the atheists and humanists are generally defining the words through the lens of mainstream Christianity. Secondly the spiritual side of the debate is not always looking through that lens. In this debate a third perspective is being ignored. The deist.
Deism is not simply the classical deism of Thomas Pain or John Locke that is known for the analogy about God being a watchmaker. Deism is more complex and has more depths; it affirms that spiritual understanding can be achieved through reason, observation, and personal experience. Contrary to popular belief, it has survived the enlightenment. Tis idea is saying that both the rational and the spiritual coexist.
Reason, does not have to be the hard-line scientific logic we often think about. The secular humanists and atheist have done a good job of framing the debate in this way. Reason and Logic is about consistency. If you accept an assumption as the basis of your world view, then your actions, thoughts, and feelings must be consistent to that assumption. This way logic and reason are fluid depending on the assumptions. If we take the assumption that scientific experience is the only reality our reason must conform to that logic; likewise, If we take the assumption that the Bible is the only truth all information is filtered through that reasoning.
Often experience and observation is inconsistent with a deeply held assumption. Many people, put on blinders and over rationalize around these inconsistencies, rather then address them directly. As an animist I have had to adjust my assumptions based on experiences and observations. Animism embraces a world view so different from the dualistic and colonial perspective that the world becomes alive and filled with other-then-human-persons we can communicate with. This may seem illogical to the dualistic colonial mind. But the two are working from two different assumptions. When an other-then-human or human person challenges my assumptions I am forced to re-evaluate that assumption.
One way to do this is with Poetic Reasoning or Creative Reasoning. In short, my poetry professor put it best as, “thinking like a poem.” Some might say it is abstract reasoning, but a good poem is not abstract; on the contrary, a good poem is very concrete, only that it strives to make the familiar unfamiliar and unfamiliar familiar. A poem uses language in unexpected ways to find the truth hidden underneath our experiences. When writing poetry, I have learned to let go of my ownership of the words.
When Poets and fiction writers talk about our craft there is an almost mystical reverence to the source of our inspiration. The Greeks called them the Muses. In the early days of literature and poetry, the poem itself had its own life and as a result often times the original “author” was lost in history. Poetry kept alive the values and world view of a people, and as these changed the poetry changed with it. The poetry of ancient and Medieval Europe was primarily concerned with narratives, whether it was cataloging the journeys of a mythic hero, or singing the praise of a saint. A well known story was often embed into the subject of the poetry. What if these narrative poems which survived into modern times, where the expression of cross-species communication, being the result of humans learning an intuitive language to the living world, and being taught this narrative poetry through ecstatic trances of different forms?
Instinct and intuition and inspiration is this intuitive language. The living world is willing to communicate with us, but many of us have forgotten how to listen, because we are no longer taught this intuitive language. Humans have been trained to fight and ignore these instincts, and to think and speak in dualism. We have been forbidden to speak this language. We can reclaim intuitive language by trusting our intuition, acting on instinct, and allowing inspiration to move us.





